4 deleted 570 characters in body
source | link

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question isEdited version: 

Q: WillWould you consider liftingreviewing the 1.5 year suspensioncases of 97832123long term suspended users, and possibly lifting the suspension if you are given the authority?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves. For example, in MO, meta is open to suspended users, and they can make objections to the moderator action there. But here when a user is suspended, they are suspended from meta as well, and given no chance to defend themselves.

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves. For example, in MO, meta is open to suspended users, and they can make objections to the moderator action there. But here when a user is suspended, they are suspended from meta as well, and given no chance to defend themselves.

Edited version: 

Would you consider reviewing the cases of long term suspended users, and possibly lifting the suspension if you are given the authority?

3 added 231 characters in body
source | link

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves. For example, in MO, meta is open to suspended users, and they can make objections to the moderator action there. But here when a user is suspended, they are suspended from meta as well, and given no chance to defend themselves.

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves.

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves. For example, in MO, meta is open to suspended users, and they can make objections to the moderator action there. But here when a user is suspended, they are suspended from meta as well, and given no chance to defend themselves.

2 added 165 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
source | link

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves.

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

On 11/19, the user 97832123 was vaporized, shortly after criticizing Jeff Atwood in a comment thread. So the question is:

Q: Will you consider lifting the 1.5 year suspension of 97832123?

Edit after Moron's comment: You may choose to answer generally, about your opinions regarding unwarranted suspensions, and suspended users' right to defend themselves.

1
source | link