Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Some questions are tagged with . I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair universityMontclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like , or , in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of needs to be clearly spelled out.

Some questions are tagged with . I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like , or , in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of needs to be clearly spelled out.

Some questions are tagged with . I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like , or , in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of needs to be clearly spelled out.

proper tag syntax
Source Link
Jeff Atwood Mod
  • 101
  • 1
  • 30
  • 86

Some questions are tagged with '[tag-removed]'. I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like '[career]', or '[soft-question]', in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of '[tag-removed]' needs to be clearly spelled out.

Some questions are tagged with '[tag-removed]'. I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like '[career]', or '[soft-question]', in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of '[tag-removed]' needs to be clearly spelled out.

Some questions are tagged with . I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like , or , in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of needs to be clearly spelled out.

Source Link
user1119
user1119

What is the role of the '[tag-removed]' tag?

Some questions are tagged with '[tag-removed]'. I am a bit confused about its purpose. It is needed to clearly state the role of this tag. That is the first problem.

Recently, the question on Montclair university received this tag, removing all the other tags.

The question might have deserved tags like '[career]', or '[soft-question]', in my opinion. Even for closed and inappropriate questions, it will be useful for taxonomic purposes to keep the descriptive tags intact. In any case, it is clear that the role of '[tag-removed]' needs to be clearly spelled out.