Timeline for List of comment templates
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2022 at 12:40 | history | edited | ACB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved comment.
|
| Feb 7, 2022 at 7:10 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @ACB I have tried to edit it a bit more to reflect the current state. (The post is CW - so it goes without saying that further improvements are welcome.) | |
| Feb 7, 2022 at 7:09 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 167 characters in body
|
| Feb 6, 2022 at 16:03 | comment | added | ACB | I don't see this comment much. But as of now, 'every edit' does not send the question to the reopen queue. See: meta.stackexchange.com/q/183233 | |
| Feb 5, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | Arnaud D. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated to reflect new post notices
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 14, 2016 at 15:10 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved wording/grammar
|
| Jun 8, 2015 at 5:37 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1015 characters in body
|
| Sep 25, 2014 at 8:34 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @ArthurFischer I followed your advice and removed the part about the reopen request thread. (But it would be good not to remove your comment, so that other users who edit this template see that this was done on purpose.) | |
| Sep 25, 2014 at 8:33 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Sep 25, 2014 at 8:22 | comment | added | user642796 Mod | I'd really prefer that the "reopen requests" thread not be included in this. Ideally that thread should be reserved for more clear-cut cases, and advertising this thread will likely result in a lot of re-open requests for poor questions which haven't been improved. (The moderators regularly receive flags requesting the re-opening of such questions.) | |
| Sep 25, 2014 at 7:18 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 25, 2014 at 7:18 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Creation of this template was prompted by Willie Wong saying in a related post: Perhaps this should also be made better known to the poster! Quite frequently I've seen inessential edits bump questions into the review queue, well before they are ready to be reconsidered. The post is CW, if you have an idea how to improve the wording, please, edit it. | |
| Sep 25, 2014 at 7:12 | history | answered | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |