Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
  1. What is your stance on edits that only correct small pieces of the formatting of questions? For example, turning plain-text equations into latex. There was actually a recent meta question about minor edits a month agoa month ago. Since the problem in that meta question was about the necromancing of old questions via edits, would your stance change if these edits were on recently asked questions? And where do you draw the line on what a significant edit vs. a minor edit is?

  2. On the topic of necromantic posts. If a question was answered long ago with a correct and satisfactory accepted answer, but it made to the front page of the question list again because of an edit, how would you respond? How would you respond if it was bumped due to a new answer?

  1. What is your stance on edits that only correct small pieces of the formatting of questions? For example, turning plain-text equations into latex. There was actually a recent meta question about minor edits a month ago. Since the problem in that meta question was about the necromancing of old questions via edits, would your stance change if these edits were on recently asked questions? And where do you draw the line on what a significant edit vs. a minor edit is?

  2. On the topic of necromantic posts. If a question was answered long ago with a correct and satisfactory accepted answer, but it made to the front page of the question list again because of an edit, how would you respond? How would you respond if it was bumped due to a new answer?

  1. What is your stance on edits that only correct small pieces of the formatting of questions? For example, turning plain-text equations into latex. There was actually a recent meta question about minor edits a month ago. Since the problem in that meta question was about the necromancing of old questions via edits, would your stance change if these edits were on recently asked questions? And where do you draw the line on what a significant edit vs. a minor edit is?

  2. On the topic of necromantic posts. If a question was answered long ago with a correct and satisfactory accepted answer, but it made to the front page of the question list again because of an edit, how would you respond? How would you respond if it was bumped due to a new answer?

Source Link
Axoren
  • 2.3k
  • 11
  • 7

  1. What is your stance on edits that only correct small pieces of the formatting of questions? For example, turning plain-text equations into latex. There was actually a recent meta question about minor edits a month ago. Since the problem in that meta question was about the necromancing of old questions via edits, would your stance change if these edits were on recently asked questions? And where do you draw the line on what a significant edit vs. a minor edit is?

  2. On the topic of necromantic posts. If a question was answered long ago with a correct and satisfactory accepted answer, but it made to the front page of the question list again because of an edit, how would you respond? How would you respond if it was bumped due to a new answer?