Timeline for Tag management 2015
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 9:14 | comment | added | got trolled too much this week | It might even be better if the process-related teaching and learning tags were burnianted too. The Math Educators SE seems to fill that gap, although it seems to exclude "Math Self-Educators". | |
| Feb 27, 2015 at 8:49 | comment | added | got trolled too much this week | One thing I'm afraid would happen though is that the "learning" tag will become equally useless over time unless strong language is added there to emphasize that it should only be used about the process of learning and just not for any self-posed question. | |
| Feb 27, 2015 at 8:38 | comment | added | got trolled too much this week | The main problem with the self-learning is that it's not clear if it is meant for "self-assigned homework" or for "where can I learn about X by myself". The latter type of question seems much more suitable for reference-request, while tagging the former with a specific flag is rather pointless in an universe where the tag "homework" is undesirable. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 23:28 | comment | added | Caleb Stanford | I've gone through and manually retagged all questions tagged only with self-learning. There are too many total (self-learning) questions to retag them all, but perhaps a bit more targeted retagging (e.g., look at questions tagged both (self-learning) and (soft-question), these are likely to need to be tagged (self-learning)) and then we can delete (self-learning). | |
| Jan 6, 2015 at 18:16 | history | edited | Caleb Stanford | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 615 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2015 at 16:26 | comment | added | Grigory M | Splitting (education) into (teaching) and (learning) seemed like a good idea — but now I see that, say, 'What parts of a pure mathematics undergraduate curriculum have been discovered since 1964?' is (education) but neither (teaching) nor (learning)... | |
| Jan 4, 2015 at 0:18 | comment | added | Grigory M | I'm not sure I like the second suggestion — (teaching) has very clear meaning [even if it's sometimes misused], distinct from (education) [which is much more loose] | |
| Jan 4, 2015 at 0:09 | comment | added | Grigory M | related discussion (started in 2010, but last answer 04.2014) | |
| Jan 3, 2015 at 23:56 | history | answered | Caleb Stanford | CC BY-SA 3.0 |