2 deleted 11 characters in body
source | link

Whatever its advantages or disadvantages in other categories, the "work and effort" question closure movement never made any sense for postings in the (contest-math) tag. Where there are downvotes or close votes on tagged contest questions it is mainly the result of believers in the work-effort-context philosophy voting to enforce that philosophy where it does not fit. If you see an absence of down/close voting on a bare contest problem, the system is working properly.

Some of the reasons the closures never made sense on contest problems:

  • There is no connection between contest problems, and the homework or (supposedly) "low quality" postings that were given as the justification for closing questions.

  • The rate of appearance of contest problems is modest, and the argument that the site will be flooded if those posts are not limited does not apply.

  • It has never been the tradition in the contest problem community to provide more than the question, and a source for the problem/solution where known. The latter are the only form of context that is considered relevant, and are not always available. One effect of posting without that context is that people who recognize the source can add it.

  • Contest problems help to draw and retain high ability users who can also participate in other areas.

Compared to other sites, MSE has a large (absolute) number of problem specialists, and it is of interest to them to give them free rein to share problems. If it is not possible to post bare contest problems without hassle then the (contest-math) tag should be split off as its own site where problem solvers can operate freely by the norms that prevail in that community.

Whatever its advantages or disadvantages in other categories, the "work and effort" question closure movement never made any sense for postings in the (contest-math) tag. Where there are downvotes or close votes on tagged contest questions it is mainly the result of believers in the work-effort-context philosophy voting to enforce that philosophy where it does not fit. If you see an absence of down/close voting on a bare contest problem, the system is working properly.

Some of the reasons the closures never made sense on contest problems:

  • There is no connection between contest problems, and the homework or (supposedly) "low quality" postings that were given as the justification for closing questions.

  • The rate of appearance of contest problems is modest, and the argument that the site will be flooded if those posts are not limited does not apply.

  • It has never been the tradition in the contest problem community to provide more than the question, and a source for the problem/solution where known. The latter are the only form of context that is considered relevant, and are not always available. One effect of posting without that context is that people who recognize the source can add it.

  • Contest problems help to draw and retain high ability users who can also participate in other areas.

Compared to other sites, MSE has a large (absolute) number of problem specialists, and it is of interest to them to give free rein to share problems. If it is not possible to post bare contest problems without hassle then the (contest-math) tag should be split off as its own site where problem solvers can operate freely by the norms that prevail in that community.

Whatever its advantages or disadvantages in other categories, the "work and effort" question closure movement never made any sense for postings in the (contest-math) tag. Where there are downvotes or close votes on tagged contest questions it is mainly the result of believers in the work-effort-context philosophy voting to enforce that philosophy where it does not fit. If you see an absence of down/close voting on a bare contest problem, the system is working properly.

Some of the reasons the closures never made sense on contest problems:

  • There is no connection between contest problems, and the homework or (supposedly) "low quality" postings that were given as the justification for closing questions.

  • The rate of appearance of contest problems is modest, and the argument that the site will be flooded if those posts are not limited does not apply.

  • It has never been the tradition in the contest problem community to provide more than the question, and a source for the problem/solution where known. The latter are the only form of context that is considered relevant, and are not always available. One effect of posting without that context is that people who recognize the source can add it.

  • Contest problems help to draw and retain high ability users who can also participate in other areas.

Compared to other sites, MSE has a large number of problem specialists, and it is of interest to give them free rein to share problems. If it is not possible to post bare contest problems without hassle then the (contest-math) tag should be split off as its own site where problem solvers can operate freely by the norms that prevail in that community.

1
source | link

Whatever its advantages or disadvantages in other categories, the "work and effort" question closure movement never made any sense for postings in the (contest-math) tag. Where there are downvotes or close votes on tagged contest questions it is mainly the result of believers in the work-effort-context philosophy voting to enforce that philosophy where it does not fit. If you see an absence of down/close voting on a bare contest problem, the system is working properly.

Some of the reasons the closures never made sense on contest problems:

  • There is no connection between contest problems, and the homework or (supposedly) "low quality" postings that were given as the justification for closing questions.

  • The rate of appearance of contest problems is modest, and the argument that the site will be flooded if those posts are not limited does not apply.

  • It has never been the tradition in the contest problem community to provide more than the question, and a source for the problem/solution where known. The latter are the only form of context that is considered relevant, and are not always available. One effect of posting without that context is that people who recognize the source can add it.

  • Contest problems help to draw and retain high ability users who can also participate in other areas.

Compared to other sites, MSE has a large (absolute) number of problem specialists, and it is of interest to them to give free rein to share problems. If it is not possible to post bare contest problems without hassle then the (contest-math) tag should be split off as its own site where problem solvers can operate freely by the norms that prevail in that community.