The Stack Overflow podcast is back! Listen to an interview with our new CEO.
2 added 1 character in body
source | link

I think it is very dangerous to assume that the motives of an answerer are malignant. Just as we cannot occupy the mind of the one who asks the questions, we also cannot do so with the mind of the one who answers the questions.

It is the job of the person asking the question (i.e., the OP) to state the question clearly. I realize that English is not everyone's first language and I have sympathy for that, but the truth is that we conduct our business in English and therefore the OP needs to state clearly what (s)he/they is looking for in English.

Once the question has been set for a sufficiently long enough time and there is an answer that answers the question as asked, it is not proper to modify the question to reflect the original intent (which one can only assume that the person answering the question had no idea about). Rather, the OP should be told that (she)/they need to start another question.

I feel very strongly about this because I know all totoo well the frustration of painstakingly answering a question in good faith, only to have it changed on me. Each time I have appealed to a moderator, the moderator has sided with me and has had the OP reinstate the original question.

Thus, again, do not assume that whoever is answering is doing so in bad faith. You have no idea, nor do I. All we can do is answer the questions as we understand them.

I think it is very dangerous to assume that the motives of an answerer are malignant. Just as we cannot occupy the mind of the one who asks the questions, we also cannot do so with the mind of the one who answers the questions.

It is the job of the person asking the question (i.e., the OP) to state the question clearly. I realize that English is not everyone's first language and I have sympathy for that, but the truth is that we conduct our business in English and therefore the OP needs to state clearly what (s)he/they is looking for in English.

Once the question has been set for a sufficiently long enough time and there is an answer that answers the question as asked, it is not proper to modify the question to reflect the original intent (which one can only assume that the person answering the question had no idea about). Rather, the OP should be told that (she)/they need to start another question.

I feel very strongly about this because I know all to well the frustration of painstakingly answering a question in good faith, only to have it changed on me. Each time I have appealed to a moderator, the moderator has sided with me and has had the OP reinstate the original question.

Thus, again, do not assume that whoever is answering is doing so in bad faith. You have no idea, nor do I. All we can do is answer the questions as we understand them.

I think it is very dangerous to assume that the motives of an answerer are malignant. Just as we cannot occupy the mind of the one who asks the questions, we also cannot do so with the mind of the one who answers the questions.

It is the job of the person asking the question (i.e., the OP) to state the question clearly. I realize that English is not everyone's first language and I have sympathy for that, but the truth is that we conduct our business in English and therefore the OP needs to state clearly what (s)he/they is looking for in English.

Once the question has been set for a sufficiently long enough time and there is an answer that answers the question as asked, it is not proper to modify the question to reflect the original intent (which one can only assume that the person answering the question had no idea about). Rather, the OP should be told that (she)/they need to start another question.

I feel very strongly about this because I know all too well the frustration of painstakingly answering a question in good faith, only to have it changed on me. Each time I have appealed to a moderator, the moderator has sided with me and has had the OP reinstate the original question.

Thus, again, do not assume that whoever is answering is doing so in bad faith. You have no idea, nor do I. All we can do is answer the questions as we understand them.

1
source | link

I think it is very dangerous to assume that the motives of an answerer are malignant. Just as we cannot occupy the mind of the one who asks the questions, we also cannot do so with the mind of the one who answers the questions.

It is the job of the person asking the question (i.e., the OP) to state the question clearly. I realize that English is not everyone's first language and I have sympathy for that, but the truth is that we conduct our business in English and therefore the OP needs to state clearly what (s)he/they is looking for in English.

Once the question has been set for a sufficiently long enough time and there is an answer that answers the question as asked, it is not proper to modify the question to reflect the original intent (which one can only assume that the person answering the question had no idea about). Rather, the OP should be told that (she)/they need to start another question.

I feel very strongly about this because I know all to well the frustration of painstakingly answering a question in good faith, only to have it changed on me. Each time I have appealed to a moderator, the moderator has sided with me and has had the OP reinstate the original question.

Thus, again, do not assume that whoever is answering is doing so in bad faith. You have no idea, nor do I. All we can do is answer the questions as we understand them.