Timeline for Does the moderator violate the EoQS?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2022 at 17:01 | comment | added | JonathanZ | You titled it "Does the moderator violate the EoQS?". That's the topic. | |
| Aug 18, 2022 at 14:01 | comment | added | JonathanZ | This post was an ugly attack on a single member of our community. | |
| Aug 17, 2022 at 7:37 | comment | added | Brian | If a person felt swayed to a certain political view for MSE by simply reading this post, that means they themself felt some sort of issue was there from before itself. I believe, this post was really a nice opportunity for the community to grow closer and to check if what we are doing is what we are saying. | |
| Aug 16, 2022 at 21:39 | comment | added | JonathanZ | Hmm, that didn't seem to address my question. | |
| Aug 16, 2022 at 18:57 | comment | added | JonathanZ | We expect questions on the front page to be edited to meet site standards. Is there a similar policy on Meta? | |
| Aug 16, 2022 at 15:26 | comment | added | user1046533 | -1. Your answer is mostly attacking the asker and unfoundedly assuming a bad position. I am not questioning/criticizing but stating that the mentioned post on the main site has only one sentence, which is not consistent with the EoSQ standard. //"Normally opponents of the EoQS" PLEASE do not split the site in such a way. There are no opponents but users of the MSE here.// This answer nowhere attempts to answer the question in the post. | |
| Aug 16, 2022 at 15:05 | history | answered | rschwieb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |