I don't think it is a bug. \left and \right constructs account for the size of content between them, whereas \bigl and \bigr are of predefined size. The l and r are to account for horizontal spacing. See herehere.
I think this question is better suited for tex.SEtex.SE.
This is the output from latex with and without exponentiation (which uses scriptsize to change font size).
I don't think it is a bug. \left and \right constructs account for the size of content between them, whereas \bigl and \bigr are of predefined size. The l and r are to account for horizontal spacing. See here.
I think this question is better suited for tex.SE.
This is the output from latex with and without exponentiation (which uses scriptsize to change font size).
I don't think it is a bug. \left and \right constructs account for the size of content between them, whereas \bigl and \bigr are of predefined size. The l and r are to account for horizontal spacing. See here.
I think this question is better suited for tex.SE.
This is the output from latex with and without exponentiation (which uses scriptsize to change font size).
I don't think it is a bug. \left and \right constructs account for the size of content between them, whereas \bigl and \bigr are of predefined size. The l and r are to account for horizontal spacing. See here.
I think this question is better suited for tex.SE.
This is the output from latex with and without exponentiation (which uses scriptsize to change font size).
