# Please enable AMSsymbols extension for MathJax

Please enable the AMSsymbols extensionfor MathJax. The lack of this extension has led to several independent bug reports.

More independent bug reports (everyone, please feel free to add them if/when you can edit this post):

• The fourth link you included is to a thread on the 404 error page, is that what you meant to do? Nov 14 '10 at 21:48
• Dear Carl, you do know that \Rightarrow (or one of its lengthened varieties) gives \implies, right?
– 97832123
Nov 14 '10 at 22:13
• @Willie: I was the one who made that post. I had wanted to use the $\nexists$ symbol, which renders slightly better than $\not\exists$. KennyTM helpfully edited my post to fix it, but that means one has to link to the revision history to see evidence of the problem.
– user856
Nov 15 '10 at 3:59
• @97832123: actually I ran into this problem with the Hebrew letter beth. For random newcomers, having the macros available would be the easiest solution. Nov 15 '10 at 4:57
• @KennyTM: why did you remove the "bug" tag from this post? It's clearly a bug - the symbols that numerous people expect to work don't work. Apart from that - is there any specific tag that flags the post to get the attention of the people who can activate the extension? Nov 15 '10 at 18:09
• @Carl: A bug is some wrong outcome that is not what the designer expected, therefore they can be denied by [status-bydesign]. So far this is clearly by-design as extensions are not turned on before we request it. A feature-request is some desired outcome that (most of) you want to be. A feature-request doesn't mean it is less important than a bug. Nov 15 '10 at 18:52
• @Carl: The [tex] tag should be sufficient. Nov 15 '10 at 18:52
• Can we get a timeline on a response to this? Recently I've been rather discouraged by the response of site administrators: from my perspective, it seems that almost all of their intervention has been negative. (I was especially distressed by the locking of a thread that detailed a very reasonable complaint.) This should be an easy opportunity to improve morale... Nov 16 '10 at 1:25
• @KennyTM: "A feature-request doesn't mean it is less important than a bug." Perhaps not, but I'm pretty sure it gets less priority than a bug.
– user856
Nov 16 '10 at 5:19
• @Rahul: One's priority does not affect the nature of the issue. Nov 16 '10 at 6:17
• @KennyTM: Fair enough. I still feel ought to be a distinction between the "It would be nice if I had a pony"-style feature requests, and "The product is working as designed, but there is something wrong with the design " issues. I would consider that sort of thing a bug in the very design. But there's no way to express that, so I suppose [feature-request] will have to do.
– user856
Nov 16 '10 at 6:33