We used to have the close reason "too localised", whose text was:

This question is unlikely to ever help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet.

It was considered to be prone to misuse, or at the very best its text did not match the message that the closing intended to convey (which basically boils down to the part before the semicolon). It was removed as a part of the closing system overhaul in June (reference).

With the overhaul, Maths.SE gained the ability to have custom close reasons. Currently, we have only one: "This question is missing context and/or other details" (reference).

TL;DR? Start here

My proposal is to introduce another custom close reason, similar in intent to the old "too localised" reason.

I imagine this close reason to apply to cases such as:

and I'm sure there are more (although, as detailed below, I consider particularly the second bullet point to apply to a lot of questions already).


A bit more on the "specific instance" questions. There are quite some questions asking about problems that are (or at least, seem to be) designed exclusively for familiarising students/readers with definitions, theorems, and the material in general.

If such questions are not answered with something similar to the "exhaustively detailed general solution" type of answer, they are not likely to help future readers. In fact, if they are searching for answers to this type of question, we actually want to get the message across that they need to get their hands dirty.

Part of this is currently being dealt with by the "missing context" reason. If OP adds context, it's likely that some custom-tailored replies are posted to help them take any remaining hurdles.

On the other hand, many of these questions will -- once OP has been guided to the solution -- be of negligible value to future users. I contend that it is a good thing to weed out this type of question by closures. Don't get me wrong, I'm favouring the "helping OP" part of what MSE is, but I do think that for the "repository of mathematical knowledge" part of MSE it is beneficial to have a mechanism to weed out those questions whose merit is confined to the former aspect of MSE.

The new close reason would be a welcome aid to this end. (But even when this application is disregarded/disapproved of, I still contend that the close reason is useful enough.)

Thread scope

I would like to discuss the wording of such a reason in a different post, and confine the present thread to the discussion of the desirability of such a close reason.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How can you ever judge that a question will not be interesting to any "future visitor"? I've seen examples of this close reason (not only on m.se) for questions that I find actually quite interesting. There is a simple way to express for yourself that you do not like a question: do not answer it. $\endgroup$
    – WimC
    Dec 9, 2013 at 19:11

1 Answer 1


First, this looks like the post on Meta Stack Overflow announcing the nuking of "too localised". Before I get into the desirability of another close reason, it would make sense to see if the "replacements" work well with what we want.

Judging from that article, the intention was to use the "off-topic" reasons instead of "too localised"

Given that the "missing context" reason:

This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.

is the only one with any sort of site-specific text, it sounds like we either need another off-topic reason or to break this one down (or possibly both). At least in my opinion, we really ought to have more reasons, each one with a narrower scope (i.e. no "umbrella" close reasons). A close reason with a wide scope lends itself to misuse. For comparison, Stack Overflow has 5 reasons with site-specific text.

TL;DR I agree that we should have another close reason, and I think the list of "off-topic" close reasons should at least be looked over again while this is being discussed. Also, if possible, we should avoid having "umbrella" close reasons; even if this means creating not one new reason, but two or three.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .