0
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/685061/undefinably-large-algebra?noredirect=1#comment1437509_685061 The question has been substantially rewritten since being put on hold. Any further suggestions on making the question reopenable? Answers from people involved with the question especially wanted.

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by user61527, Bill Dubuque, Thomas, Did, rschwieb Feb 25 '14 at 13:16

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I have not read your question, but if hope to have it reopened I suggest editing the question. As it is formatted right now. But things into paragraphs and use LaTeX (MathJax) when typesetting the math. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Feb 23 '14 at 20:35
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For reopen requests please use this devoted thread. $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Feb 23 '14 at 20:47
  • $\begingroup$ I guess it would be a good start if you would define terms like "axiomatic system". $\endgroup$ – Michael Greinecker Feb 23 '14 at 20:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelGreinecker, yeah you are probably right. I think I've learned general, informal ideas do not go over well on this site. It is important to have general, informal ideas but this site isn't a place for collaborating on that level. Plus the devil may very well be in the details (as much as it seems impossible without seeing them!). $\endgroup$ – Jacob Wakem Feb 27 '14 at 3:50

Browse other questions tagged .