This question already has an answer here:

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/685061/undefinably-large-algebra?noredirect=1#comment1437509_685061 The question has been substantially rewritten since being put on hold. Any further suggestions on making the question reopenable? Answers from people involved with the question especially wanted.


marked as duplicate by user61527, Bill Dubuque, Thomas, Did, rschwieb Feb 25 '14 at 13:16

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I have not read your question, but if hope to have it reopened I suggest editing the question. As it is formatted right now. But things into paragraphs and use LaTeX (MathJax) when typesetting the math. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Feb 23 '14 at 20:35
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For reopen requests please use this devoted thread. $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Feb 23 '14 at 20:47
  • $\begingroup$ I guess it would be a good start if you would define terms like "axiomatic system". $\endgroup$ – Michael Greinecker Feb 23 '14 at 20:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelGreinecker, yeah you are probably right. I think I've learned general, informal ideas do not go over well on this site. It is important to have general, informal ideas but this site isn't a place for collaborating on that level. Plus the devil may very well be in the details (as much as it seems impossible without seeing them!). $\endgroup$ – Jacob Wakem Feb 27 '14 at 3:50

Browse other questions tagged .