When I am doing first-post reviews, I notice that I treat questions and answers differently.

For first-post questions I think am quite relaxed. No spam, reasonably clear, good references and so on then it is an approved.

While for first-post answers, I skip most posts of them because they are outside my area of expertise, and I think a more knowledgable reviewer should have a look.

This made me wonder if there should be two queues, one for the first question and another for the first answer.

Lets discuss, or is the way I review just wrong?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ What time of day do you usually review first posts? Every time I've gone to the review queue it's empty at the level I can review (there always seem to be close votes but it's above my score). $\endgroup$
    – user153918
    Apr 29 '15 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see anything "wrong" with how you differentiate first post reviews of question vs. answer. However the first-post review may occasion making constructive comments, so that new users get off on a good footing. $\endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Apr 29 '15 at 16:52
  • $\begingroup$ I see what you mean, Alonzo. I can review first posts, late answers, low quality posts and suggested edits. A few minutes ago I went through three suggested edits, and that felt like a lot. Though right now there are 30 close votes, but I can't review those either. $\endgroup$ May 1 '15 at 3:28

In a way, this already exists. If someone prefers to review only questions, or only answers in First Posts queue, they can filter accordingly:


The setting is "sticky", meaning the site will remember your preference next time you go into the queue.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .