18
$\begingroup$

Are questions about the names of things in mathematics on-topic on math.SE? If not, can they be asked in Meta?

I am quite good at mathematics but often I don't know what things are called. For instance, I wanted to find the area under a curve for a particular function. I looked up the name of the function on Wikipedia and there was a huge amount of information. I didn't know what I was looking for was called integration until I posted a question on math.SE. Someone left a comment saying that the information I wanted was given in detail on the Wikipedia page, which once I knew what the name was I was able to verify.

So, where is the best place to ask what things are called?

$\endgroup$
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ If you are trying to choose between meta and main, then you should ask on main. These are not at all appropriate for meta [which is for topics related to the runnings of the site itself]. So go for it. Or you can ask in chat. But really, how many different questions about names can you have? $\endgroup$ – davidlowryduda Feb 7 '16 at 11:32
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @mixedmath The answer to that question is not computable in advance... :-) $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 7 '16 at 11:52
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ Are some of the questions on the main site, which are tagged (terminology), similar to the type of questions you have in mind? My impression is that most of the questions in this tag have been well received. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Feb 7 '16 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin Good to know there's a terminology tag. I feel silly asking what seems to me to be such a basic question, but it seems that usually the more basic a question is, the better it is received. I also feel that if I know how and when to apply, say, Newton's Method and why it works, then I should already know what it's called. $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 7 '16 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ It seems you would benefit from some of the books that give a survey of all of mathematics. i have What Is Mathematics by Courant and Robbins. also The Universal Encyclopedia of Mathematics translated from a 1960 German original. Other books that specialize a bit, Geometry and the Imagination by Hilbert and Cohn-Vossen. See also maa.org/press/books for more recent books, many categories. $\endgroup$ – Will Jagy Feb 7 '16 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ @WillJagy That sounds like a great way to learn things about maths I never knew before, but I'm not sure how I would use it to find the name of a concept I already know about? $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 7 '16 at 22:41
  • $\begingroup$ It's the difference between a dictionary and an encyclopedia. The latter has discussion surrounding concepts you know, and this will include related names. $\endgroup$ – Will Jagy Feb 7 '16 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ @WillJagy Would I be able to look up "area under a curve" to find the name "integration", as an example? $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 7 '16 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ Tell you what, try that in Google and, more to the point, Wikipedia. Yes, the second choice seems better. I put area under a curve wiki and the very first item was the wikipedia article on integration. $\endgroup$ – Will Jagy Feb 7 '16 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ @WillJagy OK! Thanks for that. With that example I thought "area under a curve" was the proper name for it until the comment on my question that I mentioned. I've tried searching on Google for other concepts and I haven't found what I was looking for. $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 7 '16 at 23:14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Wikipedia does have a huge amount of information. Whether that information is correct or not is a whole other story... $\endgroup$ – Bob Happ Feb 8 '16 at 21:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @BobHapp I don't know why people bash Wikipedia so much. There a chance that the information is wrong, but the actual occurrence is very low because they have a good model for ensuring correct information. You can't rely on it being correct, but it is rarely wrong. $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 9 '16 at 1:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CJ Two Wikipediocracy posts you should read: wikipediocracy.com/2015/03/15/jared-owens-god-of-wikipedia and wikipediocracy.com/2013/10/20/… $\endgroup$ – Robert Soupe Feb 9 '16 at 4:05
  • $\begingroup$ There are examples of Wikipedia being wrong on math for long periods of time, though I can't think of such an example at the moment. $\endgroup$ – Mr. Brooks Feb 9 '16 at 22:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But at least with Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking, if they make a mistake, we can say "Einstein was wrong" or "Hawking was wrong." If Wikipedia makes a mistake, can we really take 24.188.154.128 or ClueBotNG to task for their mistakes? Can you downvote 121.74.66.183 for a wrong fact? $\endgroup$ – Mr. Brooks Feb 10 '16 at 22:20
18
$\begingroup$

Your question immediately made me wonder how come there isn't a terminology tag. But then I looked it up and found there is in fact such a tag: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/terminology

Questions on the usage and meaning of words in mathematics, the names for mathematical entities, and other such questions.

This is a recent question with that tag: Is there a term for a function where equal output values must come from only one contiguous range of input values?

It was asked six hours ago and no one has suggested it should be closed for being off-topic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I recently asked a question on Meta (not Meta.math) about finding appropriate tags. You don't know what you don't know until you find out! $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 9 '16 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ I wish other stack exchanges were as accepting. I had a question shot down on programmers.stackexchange.com for being a "name that thing" question. I eventually found the answer to it (the term Extract Variable) but was unable to add the answer as the question had been closed and deleted. $\endgroup$ – Bob Stein Feb 18 '16 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ @BobStein-VisiBone I've found that as a bit of a gotcha on different Stack Exchange sites. Some communities are very flexible and forgiving, while others will try to shoot you down in flames as quickly as possible. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that all SE sites are equal! $\endgroup$ – CJ Dennis Feb 24 '16 at 7:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .