A lot of people ask questions regarding tricky integrals or limits, and they simply get tagged calculus limit, or calculus integral.

Actually what's happening is we're forming a nice bank of tricky questions, often with good solutions.

If we tagged tricky questions with tricky-questions then we could easily look through the repository for some nice credit-free problem set exercises (that have solutions!)

| |
  • $\begingroup$ Downvoters, care to voice your opinions via the "comment" feature? $\endgroup$ – bobobobo Jun 1 '11 at 21:04
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I personally don't see an actual sense to use this tag, moreover how users should know that this is a tricky question, and not a simple question or an open problem. In fact, I see a lot of newcomers abusing this tag, and a whole lot of unnecessary retagging in the process. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Jun 1 '11 at 21:36
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ One problem is that it is completely subjective. What one person may find "Tricky" another may not. How do we know if a question is "Tricky"? What does that even mean? I believe the current tags try to be as concrete as possible. $\endgroup$ – Eric Naslund Jun 1 '11 at 23:58
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I already suffer much when I see people asking questions with titles like "difficult question about..." or "easy question on...". Please don't! :) $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jun 2 '11 at 3:29
  • $\begingroup$ Moreover, it's a meta tag (like e.g. "soft question"), and meta tags are generally discouraged. $\endgroup$ – Hendrik Vogt Jun 2 '11 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with @Eric, that it is subjective. What about tagging with exercise? $\endgroup$ – bobobobo Jul 9 '11 at 14:37

This is almost the very definition of a meta-tag, so ... no.


Almost all the arguments against any meta-tag tag apply to this proposed tag as well.

I think the [subjective] tag is useless at best and actively harmful at worst.

Useless, because for all the talk about filtering by or filtering out subjective questions using that tag, it’s a poor tool for the job simply because the criteria for its use are, well, subjective. I can tell you what a poll is, or a FAQ, or a list, or a getting-to-know-you (GTKY) question… But where the border lies for subjective I cannot say.

And harmful, because there are some users who actually believe that, like community wiki, it’s some sort of magic that allows you to ignore the normal posting standards.

It’s been used pejoratively and defensively, without any real consistency, for a long long time now. Time to go.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .