# Does this edit “improve” the formatting? [duplicate]

Per the comment submitted with the edit: "Improved formatting." With the edited formatting, however, the title of this question appears with the unformatted syntax and, imho, looks worse:

Are there guidelines re: such formatting for this site?

I assume the internet looks the same for me as most all others, but is there a reason to use \$\formatting$ as compared to the symbols I used in the original title and body?

I ask because I think the original implication symbol looks better not only in context (the $\implies$ from \$\implies$ compared to the original symbol used ⇒) when formatted, but also due to the unformatted results pictured above. I'd like to rollback the edit so I figured I would ask first here.

Of note, the title gets formatted properly in the list generated from a tag search:

## marked as duplicate by quid♦ discussion StackExchange.ready(function() { if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return; $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() { var$hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');$hover.hover( function() { $hover.showInfoMessage('', { messageElement:$msg.clone().show(), transient: false, position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 }, dismissable: false, relativeToBody: true }); }, function() { StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages(); } ); }); }); Apr 25 '17 at 10:06

• Looking at questions tagged mathjax+unicode, these questions seem related: θ vs. $\theta$ - What is preferred? Unicode or MathJax? and Would HTML/Unicode formatting cause troubles? (Some of other posts linked there might be of interest, too.) – Martin Sleziak Apr 24 '17 at 20:50