-6
$\begingroup$

I wondered if the tags Lucas Sequences and Basis might be of use? I imagine these would be sub-tags of sequences-and-series and linear-algebra.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ About the "basis" tag : math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21091/… $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. May 3 '18 at 10:57
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ And regarding Lucas sequences : we already have tags for "sequences-and-series", "recurrence-relations" and "lucas-numbers". I don't think a tag for Lucas sequences would be very useful. $\endgroup$ – Arnaud D. May 3 '18 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ @ArnaudD. ok fair enough, makes sense. Bear in mind Lucas sequences aren't Lucas numbers so that tag would be wrong in most cases. $\endgroup$ – samerivertwice May 3 '18 at 11:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ And a bit more specific version of basis tag was discussed quite recently: Creation of a Hamel basis tag $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak May 3 '18 at 11:13
  • $\begingroup$ I've recently edited the tag info for lucas-numbers based on that of Fibonacci sequence. This tag can be used for questions on Lucas sequence. $\endgroup$ – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 7 '18 at 12:27
  • $\begingroup$ @GNUSupporter "Lucas Sequence" is a poor choice of phrase because the sequence of "Lucas Numbers" is not a canonical name for the "Lucas Sequences". $\endgroup$ – samerivertwice May 7 '18 at 12:46
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for my previous comment. Maybe I should take a rest from this site. $\endgroup$ – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 7 '18 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ @GNUSupporter not at all. It sounds like we have lucas-numbers and Lucas Sequences are discussed sufficiently infrequently they can go under sequences-and-series. $\endgroup$ – samerivertwice May 8 '18 at 0:37
5
$\begingroup$

There are a total of 25 questions containing the words "Lucas sequence", and more than half of them are actually talking about the Lucas numbers, which there's already a tag for.

Granted, many people don't know what a Lucas sequence is or even how to pronounce "Lucas", so they might be talking about Lucas sequences without calling them out by name. But if that's the case, then they're not going to be using the proposed tag, either.

And if both the lucas-sequences and lucas-numbers tags existed, then we'd have to sort out the extra confusion caused by people using one when referring to the other, too.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The problem you describe of mis-tagging of Lucas Numbers posts, sounds like it's caused by the lack of, and almost certainly would be solved by the creation of, the Lucas Sequences tag. $\endgroup$ – samerivertwice May 3 '18 at 20:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't mean that they're mis-tagged: I mean that the question contains the words "Lucas sequence" but is actually talking about the Lucas numbers, and not the more general class of sequences. $\endgroup$ – Misha Lavrov May 3 '18 at 20:41
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Okay, I'll bite. How should I properly pronounce "Lucas sequence"? #askingForAFriend $\endgroup$ – hardmath May 4 '18 at 0:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @hardmath Lucas was French, so if you're saying something more like "lew-CAH" than like "LOO-cuss", then you're basically there. $\endgroup$ – Misha Lavrov May 4 '18 at 0:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MishaLavrov : like this? $\endgroup$ – user99914 May 4 '18 at 5:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnMa I hope so. If we can't trust YouTube videos on pronouncing names, can we trust anyone? $\endgroup$ – Misha Lavrov May 4 '18 at 15:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In IPA symbol, I would pronounce [lyka] as usual, with the stress at the last syllable. $\endgroup$ – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 May 7 '18 at 14:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .