Today, there was this question posted on the main site asking about the probability of passing a genetic disease expressed by a dominant allele.
However, as soon as it was posted a few users came and asked the OP, what they had tried, and there were 2 downvotes (and maybe close flags/votes) before you knew what happened.
Now, this would normally be alright if used to influence the asker of a poor question into improving it, but in this case the OP had already given what seemed like sufficient context.
So, I came to raise the question of whether this was an example of over hasty downvoting by (presumably well-meaning) users or whether there was indeed a sufficient requirement for greater context to justify this?