I had a similar question a few days ago. There I was banned from review queues, because I seem to disagree on close votes to much. I promised to never review again, but I made a little experiment and visited again the close votes.
I just voted to not close a question, when it was (in my opinion) not fair to close. And because I am not a fan of closing question anyways, I skipped the really bad questions.
Now I am banned again from review queues. But what have I done wrong?
If you do not want an other opinion on closing a question. Then don't ask for it. That is what I wrote in my last 'rant'.
I really do not get it. When there is no appreciation of an other opinion then to close these questions, then why does it take 5 votes?
It seems it is 100% clear which questions deserve to be answered and which not. I think the one who answers the question should decide which questions he answers.
(I know that there is this meta-post on bad audits, but no one is ever going to read this, when I post there. Also it does not really fit anyways, because I did not fail an audit. At least it did not tell me. If the system is automatic, then it should be fixed. And if a human is behind it after all, I have a pretty good idea who.)