2
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I have a review audit that I'd like to dispute:

https://math.stackexchange.com/review/close/1194064

I passed this particular audit by leaving it open, but it wouldn't surprise me if someone voted to close this question for lack of context.

Is there a particular place to dispute review audits? Or do we expect a new Meta question each time?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Xander Henderson, Community May 1 at 13:54

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Why are you unwilling to close it if it has received good answers? (deletion is another matter) Or do you think the review audit is faulty and the question deserves to be closed? $\endgroup$ – YuiTo Cheng May 1 at 8:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @YuiToCheng What do you mean? $\endgroup$ – Theo Bendit May 1 at 8:52
  • $\begingroup$ OK, I don't understand what you mean by "dispute"... You can't skip it? $\endgroup$ – YuiTo Cheng May 1 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ @YuiToCheng I'm disputing it on the grounds that it is not a clear-cut case, either for closure or for leaving open. Review audits shouldn't come down to such a close personal judgement call. $\endgroup$ – Theo Bendit May 1 at 8:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why not skip it? Btw, Examples of poor review audits is the place to post poor review audits. $\endgroup$ – YuiTo Cheng May 1 at 8:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @YuiToCheng Skipping doesn't help clear the queue. If everyone skips the edge cases, then it takes ages for the question to leave the queue, and the question's fate is decided by the zealots. $\endgroup$ – Theo Bendit May 1 at 8:57
  • $\begingroup$ @YuiToCheng Ah awesome. I just tagged the question disputed-review-audit. $\endgroup$ – Theo Bendit May 1 at 8:59
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It's better to link the review itself, rather than the question itself. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila May 1 at 9:18

Browse other questions tagged .