This question from 2016:
contains a list of what the OP suspects to be errors in a famous book. The OP explains for each point their reasoning as to why they think these are errors and asks for clarification. It was recently edited and a point was added. Specifically the point 0) was added to the list.
I'm not sure, should this edit be rolled back?
On the one hand the question does act as a sort of errata for the book, adding to which might be helpful. But on the other hand the question is personalised to the OPs concerns, and resolved issues are not "removed" from the list, so using this question as a depository of typos found by anybody seems incorrect. Further the added error is a triviality, which gives a bad first impression of the OP and of the value of their questions, which is problematic since this point was not actually a question from the OP.