Kindly, don't hide my this legal inquiry like so many other topics of mine that had been hidden in so many mathematical sections at SE where not a single convincing reason was provided by all the moderators who deliberately have hidden so many other true proven discoveries of mine and since many years as well
Nobody has hidden any true discoveries of yours. You can post all you like on viΧra, and no one here will attempt to stop you. And don't claim you have a "legal inquiry" when you don't.
However, I do have printed copies of my deleted issues that will be soon exposed in other opened mind sites for further investigations and true historical purposes about so many fundamental issues in mathematics
What is getting exposed now is your attitude towards the mathematical community. And "opened mind" ≠ "open-minded".
If you insist to hide it here, then this topic is going to be publically published in other less moderated and unmoderated sites and exactly as it happened without adding or subtracting a word, and we know that those anonymous downvoters have the most interest in hiding these topics for their own purposes, but they don't know yet that most of the populations have already become more expert people in their own fields of no true mathematics, simply observe the thousands of repeated unanswered questions asked by clever school kids say on Quora for example, and soon they will invade you too
Is that a threat? Do you see any real mathematician hiding your posts "for their own purposes"? And what are "fields of no true mathematics"? If a field is of "no true mathematics", what good is it for anyone to become experts in it?
This is the case with false maths, where also Qoura would never show you many answers that were reported by so many academic anonymous mathematicians who can't defend their mathematics but want simply protect their old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs
What is your evidence that it is others who have "old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs"?
This is truly not any game, it is an old finished story about real number discovery by that Pythagorian who was thrown to see, but people again repeated the same old tragedy when expressing the true discovered irrational numbers by their decimal rational numbers and never being aware that even the decimal rational field is also endless field, thus mimicking the older Pythagoreans who didn't tolerate the discovery by going back to Euclidean rational numbers and up to date, and innocently being deceived about non-real numbers like those transedential and algebraic numbers (non-c)
There is a rigorous and precise mathematical definition of "real number" and "algebraic number" and "transcendental number", and there are many transcendental real numbers. And... $0$ is an algebraic real number. If you have some other idea of "number", then you are not talking about real numbers, and it is your responsibility to define what you mean, rather than call others "deceived".
I never trust the honesty, Nobility of any moderated site or any other official mathematical authorities like the alleged top-most repuitable Journals and Universities in such a very huge big issues based on personal long experience with their human orientations for unnecessary business and human normal physicology
If you don't trust Math SE, leave instead of insulting the community here. And there is no such thing as "physicology". Moderation is necessary in any functional community, otherwise...