Why is this question completely disappearing where I have answered and got a bounty of 200?

The hidden question was:

New numeration system, mapping to binary numeration system

Where I have answered with the copyright notice that must be always respected and not only for my topics, and my answer was reworded by a bounty of 200

How is this possible on this site where I do refer to my published answer on your site for other purposes of investigational cases about new mathematical discoveries and publish them on other sites for public attention and awareness

I do still expect a legal explanation from others or moderators for such an action since I have given an answer up to my best efforts and knowledge where I never expected to be hidden and soon may be claimed by others as well

Kindly, don't hide my this legal inquiry like so many other topics of mine that had been hidden in so many mathematical sections at SE where not a single convincing reason was provided by all the moderators who deliberately have hidden so many other true proven discoveries of mine and since many years as well

However, I do have printed copies of my deleted issues that will be soon exposed in other opened mind sites for further investigations and true historical purposes about so many fundamental issues in mathematics

Bassam Karzeddin

• Again, the same irrelevant habit, downvoting anonymously then deleting then hiding the whole issue as if nobody had ever heard of, or saw before and later stealing secretly the whole issue in so much of devilish untrusted professional many methods, but here the case is so different, and this is a question also printed already, and I don't think it is of any moral that someone gets reworded one day and be stolen in the second day, it is truly a big scandal for the entire system and how its main purpose has become on how to steal amateurs true talents and keep safe the documented ignorance, – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 12 at 14:48
• If you insist to hide it here, then this topic is going to be publically published in other less moderated and unmoderated sites and exactly as it happened without adding or subtracting a word, and we know that those anonymous downvoters have the most interest in hiding these topics for their own purposes, but they don't know yet that most of the populations have already become more expert people in their own fields of no true mathematics, simply observe the thousands of repeated unanswered questions asked by clever school kids say on Quora for example, and soon they will invade you too – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 12 at 14:58
• community moderation is allowed here ... can't deal with it, you are free to leave. – user645636 Jan 12 at 16:14
• math.stackexchange.com/questions/3477718/… – user645636 Jan 12 at 16:17
• @RoddyMacPhee Thank you for your feedback but isn't truly so strange act by moderators that a question with 9 upvotes and one answer with a bounty of 200, gets completely hidden even from my own profile, without informing the participant or even commenting or providing any valid reason for such act, I wish to know what was wrong in the question or even in the answer to delete both of them without any obvious reasons except the three moderators agreements? Does a moderator have this unlimited right on this site? wonders, at any case, it is going to be publically published in many other sites – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 12 at 17:17
• free use policy might have a say there about copyright materials. cop·y·right /ˈkäpēˌrīt/ Learn to pronounce noun the exclusive legal right, given to an originator or an assignee to print, publish, perform, film, or record literary, artistic, or musical material, and to authorize others to do the same. trade·mark /ˈtrādˌmärk/ Learn to pronounce noun a symbol, word, or words legally registered or established by use as representing a company or product. – user645636 Jan 12 at 17:26
• You sound worse than a crank ( I am one). Being amateur has it's perks ( you can relate things they might not remember to things you've just learned and help everyone), that being said, it's important you know about the site you use to do these things. – user645636 Jan 12 at 17:34
• @RoddyMacPhee and as long as I don't legally copy-right them, then others are freely allowed to steal them under the sunlight and before everyone's own eyes, isn't it true this way working these days with academic professionals,? no wonder, as if the copyrighted mathematics is even true mathematics, and from the forged fake history of mathematics they show nobilities and homesites to unbelievable limits of keeping the original handwriting of genius dead boys in museums as a witness for such alleged nobility for usually dead people as always as usual with this forgotten unnoticible liy word – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 12 at 17:42
• Moderators had nothing to do with it, Bassam. Your answer was deleted by the votes of three users, not moderators. – Gerry Myerson Jan 13 at 1:49
• @GerryMyerson I can see only one downvote and usually by the same moderators, but the problem isn't in this case of deleting my answer or question since this happened with my contents almost so many times with most of my contents, the problem here is so peculiar where a moderator decides to remove an answer that had been already reworded by a bounty of 200 (around 10 upvotes), and not only that but removing the upvoted question with 9 upvotes and the lonely reworded answer even from its originator and so unlike many other deletions to my contents that are still visible to me, Why all that? – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 13 at 6:36
• @GerryMyerson And so strangely, in my case those users can't say a word, and not only in that issue but with many other deleted topics, as if they could delete the proven facts, see here for example how only in one answer I could at least convince 14 persons that $\pi$ isn't a number as per this link: quora.com/When-and-who-was-the-first-to-break-mathematics/…, whereas I could convince many other hundreds in different similar answers with irrefutable rigorous proofs, where those would ultimately come here and everywhere else to make them understand truth – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 13 at 17:02
• If you were able to convince fourteen people that $\pi$ isn't a number, that just proves there are fourteen very stupid people on quora. Anyway, you can make a case for your answer to be undeleted at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/28692/… – Gerry Myerson Jan 13 at 19:10
• @GerryMyerson The main problem with Quora is that downvotes are not recorded. OP could have 10000 downvotes but none of us would know. I suspect OP's true problem is the idea that OP thinks that there is some true math, and axiomatization is a fallacious attempt by mathematicians to reach it. Sadly, someone with this mindset can't be reached. – Don Thousand Jan 13 at 21:46
• quora.com/… This is the case with false maths, where also Qoura would never show you many answers that were reported by so many academic anonymous mathematicians who can't defend their mathematics but want simply protect their old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 14 at 6:55

Kindly, don't hide my this legal inquiry like so many other topics of mine that had been hidden in so many mathematical sections at SE where not a single convincing reason was provided by all the moderators who deliberately have hidden so many other true proven discoveries of mine and since many years as well

Nobody has hidden any true discoveries of yours. You can post all you like on viΧra, and no one here will attempt to stop you. And don't claim you have a "legal inquiry" when you don't.

However, I do have printed copies of my deleted issues that will be soon exposed in other opened mind sites for further investigations and true historical purposes about so many fundamental issues in mathematics

What is getting exposed now is your attitude towards the mathematical community. And "opened mind" ≠ "open-minded".

If you insist to hide it here, then this topic is going to be publically published in other less moderated and unmoderated sites and exactly as it happened without adding or subtracting a word, and we know that those anonymous downvoters have the most interest in hiding these topics for their own purposes, but they don't know yet that most of the populations have already become more expert people in their own fields of no true mathematics, simply observe the thousands of repeated unanswered questions asked by clever school kids say on Quora for example, and soon they will invade you too

Is that a threat? Do you see any real mathematician hiding your posts "for their own purposes"? And what are "fields of no true mathematics"? If a field is of "no true mathematics", what good is it for anyone to become experts in it?

This is the case with false maths, where also Qoura would never show you many answers that were reported by so many academic anonymous mathematicians who can't defend their mathematics but want simply protect their old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs

What is your evidence that it is others who have "old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs"?

This is truly not any game, it is an old finished story about real number discovery by that Pythagorian who was thrown to see, but people again repeated the same old tragedy when expressing the true discovered irrational numbers by their decimal rational numbers and never being aware that even the decimal rational field is also endless field, thus mimicking the older Pythagoreans who didn't tolerate the discovery by going back to Euclidean rational numbers and up to date, and innocently being deceived about non-real numbers like those transedential and algebraic numbers (non-c)

There is a rigorous and precise mathematical definition of "real number" and "algebraic number" and "transcendental number", and there are many transcendental real numbers. And... $$0$$ is an algebraic real number. If you have some other idea of "number", then you are not talking about real numbers, and it is your responsibility to define what you mean, rather than call others "deceived".

I never trust the honesty, Nobility of any moderated site or any other official mathematical authorities like the alleged top-most repuitable Journals and Universities in such a very huge big issues based on personal long experience with their human orientations for unnecessary business and human normal physicology

If you don't trust Math SE, leave instead of insulting the community here. And there is no such thing as "physicology". Moderation is necessary in any functional community, otherwise...

• math.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/31135/edit , can this link be visible or must be hidden again from public visibility? – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 29 at 13:35
• Your comment makes no sense to me. – user21820 Jan 29 at 17:26
• 21820, please go to sci. math if you are interested to know about all your wrong math definition about a true real number, here is a traditional moderated site devoted to all kinds of old human knowledge where anything new and revolutionary is strictly not permissible by the vast majorities of the academic mainstreams, this site can't tolerate a free opinion and many people know this fact about it, they simply hide great discoveries where eventually and soon would be shamed about it, sorry to tell you that your common understanding isn't any different from almost all acadimics, noyhing – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 30 at 7:32
• 21820, let us see if this can help you more to understand my hidden point that few people have already got it correctly so far, quora.com/… and once one might be able alone and independently be blessed to get it correctly, then certainly (she/he) would certainly come out from ... – Bassam Karzeddin Feb 1 at 9:16
• Please yourself go. I am not interested in all your wrong math. – user21820 Feb 1 at 10:52
• (???), Please note that reference wasn't meant necessarily for you but for anyone else may be interested in the subject to its deepest root history and no matter if that person (s) not existing these days where this is more helpful to make them realize the ever simplest facts by themselves, another link is also here: quora.com/… , where many others are freely available untill school student understand – Bassam Karzeddin Feb 1 at 13:57

Lets see,

• Potential to cite later = proof you were first.
• Questions and Answers no longer are creators property by site decorum.
• Copyright notice, is a way to be marked as spam as you're simply avertizing your own services.
• @DonThousand I truly do suggest for you and for everyone else interested in human axiomatic false definitions based on choices rather than proven facts to see that their short definitions are simply not better than many wrong decisions where a numerical counterexample based on natural numbers would certainly show the falsehood concepts they have invented are simply broken, and to see it more clearly just say if there is an existing real root for such an odd degree polynomial $(x^{49} = x^7 + 1)$, where I do claim (with many elementary proofs) that no real root ever exists, hence no any root – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 14 at 7:09
• @DonThousand If one is truly is lucky enough to understand only that this single polynomial of $(x^{49 - x^7 - 1 = 0)$ is impossible to have any real existing root in true real existing numbers, then certainly and immediately would realize many more important things that are false in the core foundation stone of the modern mathematics about all my alleged and proven claims, like the false hypothesis of continuity of real numbers, the false imaginary numbers, the false real numbers that aren't constructible, ..., etc, it is truly the greatest chances ever made for new true honest Nobel resrs. – Bassam Karzeddin Jan 14 at 8:30