Is it inappropriate to reply to questions that have had no activity for some period of time?

If so, why, and what is that period of time? (The noticeable upvoting of the first comment to a recent answer leads me to ask this.)

  • 9
    $\begingroup$ It is fine to reply, for a good reason... But the thing to avoid is bringing the question back to the front page for a trivial reason, or no reason. $\endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Commented Nov 19, 2011 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ Does upvoting questions/comments bring the question back to the front page?? I've been voting freely on anything I come across without even looking at the date. Is this discouraged? $\endgroup$
    – user7530
    Commented Nov 20, 2011 at 21:03
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I don't think upvoting bumps a question (but of course you could run a discrete experiment to see if it does). I think you have to post an answer, or edit the question or an answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2011 at 23:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @7530: it doesn't, but that hasn't stopped people from proposing that it should (which was not granted, happily enough). $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2011 at 1:19

3 Answers 3


Definitely not inappropriate. As a matter of fact, the two badges named "Revival" and "Necromancer" are ways to reward the behavior.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ On the other hand, that looks to be a meta question that you linked to, and not a question from the main site... I wonder... $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2011 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ There are necromancers on meta, too. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2011 at 16:38

if there is no accepted answer for the very old question why someone couldn't give a better answer to this question, obviously everyone would benefit from this, users which found question by searching, and the one who answered by growing reputation


I think that if it's a fine question that just was unanswered, or did not have a satisfactory answer, and you are sure you have a correct or better answer, then I think it's perfectly reasonable to answer it. People reading the question will learn something, people searching the site in the future can come across it and profit from it, and there's even a chance the original asker will still come back and read it and gain something from it.

But I do think the standard for answering inactive questions should be higher than usual... if you just have some partial answer or idea how to do it, probably it's not such a good idea, as currently the turnaround time for the main page is just a few hours and this might help get current questions lost.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .