1
$\begingroup$

In another Meta question, the OP wrote that posts in the Late Answers queue are "fun to read". Personally, I have never reviewed a post in this queue, partly because they get reviewed before I have a chance to look at them.

I'm curious to see these posts for myself. Is there a way for me to view all posts that were in the review queue, but got reviewed already?

| |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ in fact, I have suggested some ways to do this in my answer to the question you've mentioned. Although they are basically the same as in Glorfindel's answer. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Aug 6 at 10:17
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I see that now. I probably should have looked at the answers to the other question in more detail before asking this one. $\endgroup$ – Varun Vejalla Aug 6 at 17:22
2
$\begingroup$

You can do this once you have 10k reputation:

Access moderator tools

You now have access to various lists and statistical reports, giving you a broad overview of activity on the site:

...

  • The full history of reviews by all users in any /review queue

Another option is to use the Stack Exchange Data Explorer; here is a query which lists the most recent Late Answer review items up to last Sunday morning (SEDE is refreshed only once a week). Do note that some of these may be review audits.

enter image description here

| |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this! I've never used SEDE myself - what does numberOfHits mean in your query? $\endgroup$ – Varun Vejalla Aug 6 at 6:23
  • $\begingroup$ It lets you choose how many results you want. $\endgroup$ – Glorfindel Aug 6 at 6:23
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a query where using a parameter one can choose which reviews to show: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1258387/… And a similar modification of your query: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1272909/… (I have mentioned both review history and SEDE in my answer to the linked question.) $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Aug 6 at 10:15
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinSleziak heh, I didn't look at the answers there. Essentially, this is a duplicate question ... $\endgroup$ – Glorfindel Aug 6 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ I wouldn't really consider the questions to be duplicate. I'd even say it might be useful that this specific question was posted separately. (It is easier to find when posted in this way - rather than hidden in an answer to a post which is about reviews, but definitely has different focus.) $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Aug 6 at 10:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .