1
$\begingroup$
  1. https://math.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1512035

I concede I might've edited too much text, but undoubtedly the OP made typos. Saxon genitives are missing.

The problem is Bertsekas book is introductory while Ross book explains expression $E[\ E[X\mid Y] \ ]$ just by briefly saying it is a function of $y$ if I remeber correctly.

  1. https://math.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1512036

"i" as a pronoun must be capitalized.

How do i develop a very good conception in probability theory to do advanced theoretical research in communication theory? Which book do i follow to gain a solid conception about the subject.I have the original manuscript of A N Kolmogorov but do not have the mathematical background to understand it.

  1. https://math.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1512051

I emboldened the grammatical mistakes.

Tomorrow I will begin my studies, real analysis, however I have some difficulties in making statements so I thought before starting the study in real analysis, learn how to do demonstrations properly.

I know only learn by doing, but use a book as support would be of great help,

  1. https://math.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1512603

https://www.math.ubc.ca/~angel/probab/

This URL is broken, but the post doesn't say so.

Exercises with solutions for probability theory?

The title is deceptive. OP is talking about measure-theoretic probability theory, not just introductory probability theory.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ in your second case ,I wouldnt say just capitalising 'i' would count as a siginificant edit.I usually reject such edits as 'no improvement or so whatever' criterion $\endgroup$ – Albus Dumbledore Dec 23 '20 at 3:40
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ People tend to dislike edits on old posts, especially if those edits only correct the language and formatting. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Dec 23 '20 at 8:15
  • $\begingroup$ @AsafKaragila I see your point, but I think it's OK to edit old posts to fix the links. I remember the diamond Community user once did that with a script as consequence of the domain name change of Math.Meta.SE. $\endgroup$ – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 Dec 23 '20 at 8:28
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 Those scripts don't bump the posts. So incomparable. That being said, I agree that links should be kept up to date. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Dec 23 '20 at 8:33
  • $\begingroup$ All the suggested edits you link to could be reasonably rejected. You leave out some context. And the single time you capitalize i to read "I" is insufficient for suggesting an edit. $\endgroup$ – amWhy Dec 23 '20 at 23:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .