10
$\begingroup$

I'm curious if there is a way for me to easily find out who answers my questions the most/comments the most/upvotes the most/who I have upvoted the most/bookmarked the most.

Basically I would like to know which users I interact with the most and see if I can discern what topic(s) cause those interactions.

This could allow us to be more aware of who our collaborators in specific topics are which is something I'd be curious about since I notice for some posts the same group of usernames responding to my questions and would like to have a clear understanding of who all I'm interacting with.

Right now these communities aren't explicitly well defined but like I have a vague notion of the "complex analysis crew" and I imagine that there are probably subtler groups than that hiding in plainsight that have never been explicitly acknowledged.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

20
$\begingroup$

The data about voting is not publicly available, but for some things mentioned in your question, you can use SEDE. I have created a community wiki answer where various queries can be collected.

It might be worth mentioned that the queries below user the OP as an example - you can change the userid to yours (or the userid of any other user). See also: What is my user id and how do I check it? on this meta and What is my user ID? on Meta Stack Exchange.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The availability of who bookmarks my posts, to me, seems like a violation of privacy; just as it would be a violation of privacy to ask and get a response to "Who upvotes me the most?" or "Who downvotes me the most? " And remember, more for the OP, that a lot of users also bookmark very poor to ensure a way to follow up on closure or deletion. I would encourage users to use search capabilities to research non-self-centric facts. $\endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Jan 27, 2022 at 20:42
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @amWhy Since you have brought up bookmarks as a privacy issue here, I will mention some related posts on Meta Stack Exchange: Is seeing other people's favorites a privacy issue? and Can there be an option to keep your list of bookmarks private? (And I would not be surprised if there are other discussions related to this. In any case, this is probably for a separate discussion - at the moment, bookmarks are publicly displayed, there is even an option search for inbookmarks:userid. $\endgroup$ Jan 27, 2022 at 21:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the added info, @Martin. I just meant to note that I seemed like it could be problematic, potentially. But I also want users to know, as explained in my first comment, that a handful of others' bookmarks of one's post is not necessarily a sign the posts they were quality posts. That wasn't meant to you, but readers: just that bookmarks aren't equivalent to "likes". $\endgroup$
    – amWhy
    Jan 27, 2022 at 21:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just to note, the posted links seem to be related to user:58294 (frogeyedpeas) and need adjustment to relate to somebody else, such as me $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Jan 31, 2022 at 21:01
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Henry Yes, that's true - of course, userid of any user can be enter into the boxes with parameters. (Alternatively, you could simply edit the userid in the URL.) Posting those queries with some userid entered seemed to me a better option than leaving it empty - some users wouldn't know what to enter there and it might be unclear to them what the query actually does. (I have edited the post a bit - it is CW, so you should not hesitate to edit it further if needed.) $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2022 at 11:56
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinSleziak No problem. I put my note to reduce the chance of others repeating my mistake: I initially thought I was being stalked by frogeyedpeas, who I had never heard of $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Feb 1, 2022 at 13:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "The data about voting are..." :( *pouts* $\endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson Mod
    Feb 2, 2022 at 1:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .