Is providing link to my (8 pages) proof of P=NP and asking to check my proof appropriate for a math.SE question?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
2
-
8$\begingroup$ I can't believe that there are 3 users close-voting this post with the reason that this should be posted on main instead..... $\endgroup$– Arctic CharAug 22 at 10:27
-
1$\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? $\pi + e$ is irrational, I want to share but nervous. $\endgroup$– user1729Aug 22 at 12:49
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
No. It is not. This is not the purpose of this website.
answered Aug 18 at 8:40
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
2
No, I'm not sure any stackexchange website would be considered appropriate for your "proof".
P = NP is considered an unsolved problem, "The problem has been called the most important open [unknown] problem in computer science." Some of the brightest minds and PhD's in math and computer science have attempted to prove or P = NP without success. Either your proof has a mistake, which is most likely, or you will get the equivalent of a Nobel prize in Computer Science, which is extremely unlikely. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem
At the very least consider phrasing your question- "Where is the mistake in my proof?"
-
7$\begingroup$ This is even less appropriate on MathOverflow than here, and arguably this is also the case for the cs websites. I'm not sure what would make you say otherwise. $\endgroup$– Asaf Karagila ModAug 18 at 9:10
-
2$\begingroup$ At least on CS or CStheory the topic would be correct. I have edited my answer though. $\endgroup$– nickalhAug 18 at 10:12