I just edited this question.
While doing that, I introduced a table, like this one:
a | b |
---|---|
11 | 22 |
This is created as follows:
| a| b|
|----|----|
| 11| 22|
I don't like the font, so let's turn this into MathJax:
a | b |
---|---|
$11$ | $22$ |
This is created as follows:
| a| b|
|------|------|
| $11$| $22$|
Then, I thought "Wouldn't it be far better putting the entire table in MathJax instead of every single value?", so I tried but I failed:
$| a| b| |----|----| | 11| 22|$
=>Oops, this is not displayed as a table anymore :-(
This failure is created as:
$| a| b|
|----|----|
| 11| 22|$
Wouldn't it be great if MathJax was extended with the understanding of tables (and other StackExchange formatting)? :-)
$$\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{a} & \textbf{b} \\\hline 11 & 22 \\\hline \end{array}$$
to get $$\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{a} & \textbf{b} \\\hline 11 & 22 \\\hline \end{array}.$$ (I am not sure whether it is possible to put source as "multiline" in a comment - this can be done in a post.) See also: Is it possible to see the source for a comment? $\endgroup$