6
$\begingroup$

What's the difference between the [physics] and [mathematical-physics] tags? Are they similar enough that we shouldn't have both?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Retaging all current mathematical-physics into physics should be OK, I think.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

They bring to mind different things to me. "Physics" probably means something like quantum mechanics, while mathematical-physics probably means something like Chern-Simons Theory or the 2-dimensional Ising model. Basically "Physics" means questions that are actually of interest to physicists, while "mathematical physics" is usually about mathematical results which are inspired by (but don't directly involve) physics. But given the existence of MO, I doubt there will be many "mathematical-physics" questions here that aren't "physics" and so there's probably no harm in merging. At MO I'd be against merging.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a discernable difference in the questions currently tagged with one versus the other? $\endgroup$ – Isaac Aug 8 '10 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ that's why I suggest retaging current mathematical-physics into physics, and not merging them — maybe we'll have real mathematical-physics some day $\endgroup$ – Grigory M Aug 8 '10 at 7:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .