11
$\begingroup$

yesterday the following edit was made https://math.stackexchange.com/posts/33730/revisions which deletes content from an (very old) answer. Taking liberty to edit and perform such censorship/deletion seems not appropriate as it is not community wiki. He should have rolled back rather than deleted bit the he doesn't like.

And now someone else did it https://math.stackexchange.com/posts/33730/revisions

$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ agreed. I will roll back. $\endgroup$
    – robjohn Mod
    Commented Jan 26, 2013 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks to robjohn, Did and Zev. $\endgroup$
    – user58512
    Commented Jan 26, 2013 at 21:26

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

Thank you for keeping an eye out for things like this. For what it is worth, in the future, it suffices to flag the post in question for moderator attention; it is not necessary to open up a discussion on Meta.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The answer was locked, and a notice was added. "Community" unlocked it and removed the notice. Is this the work of a person, or automatic/software? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28, 2013 at 2:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The imposed lock was a timed-lock, which can be set for a fixed period. After the period expires, the community user automatically unlocks the post. $\endgroup$
    – Willie Wong Mod
    Commented Jan 28, 2013 at 8:46

You must log in to answer this question.