I have reworded not just the title but also the description along the lines you suggest, to make it less contentious, although I would have preferred the original wording for the following reasons.
I asked this question not because I don't have plenty of answers myself but because I thought it was typical of the kind of question that many future visitors to this site would want to ask, even in the way it was worded, and this week we are trying to build up a stock of questions and answers that future visitors will find interesting and helpful.
I have been disappointed to see the kind of responses there have been from a subset of the people who have contributed. To the kind of person we hope will visit this site in future, these responses would have come across as a real put-down.
This kind of thing has happened all too often at MO, and this site is supposed to offer an alternative to that. People with harsh, purist and superior attitudes should stay over at MO and not promote these attitudes here.
The answer I eventually accepted was produced very quickly (within an hour, I think) and was friendly, helpful and encouraging. It saw beyond the philosophical ambiguity in the question and gave what was really being asked for. This is the kind of response we need to see here.