8
$\begingroup$

This is maybe minor, but it used to be really easy to tell if a question had an accepted answer and it's annoyingly hard now. I guess you want the checkmark to be lighter than the text, but maybe you could 1) make both the checkmark and the green text darker, and 2) make the checkmark a little bigger or something.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My suggestion of a circular outline instead was either not noticed or silently rejected after consideration. I don't want to harp on it, so I'm posting this here once and won't again. $\endgroup$ – Rahul Oct 25 '10 at 23:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree, though I'm happy to see the change to a consistent use of a checkmark everywhere (the triple dot triangle employed in the prior revision - besides being inconsistent - reminded me too much of a nuclear hazard sign!). $\endgroup$ – Bill Dubuque Oct 25 '10 at 23:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rahul: the problem I see with that is that, while it's visible, it's a little unclear what it means. So not optimal from a design perspective, I guess. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 25 '10 at 23:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree, the checkmark is too subtle. $\endgroup$ – leonbloy Oct 26 '10 at 13:44
1
$\begingroup$

I removed the check mark all together and replaced it with a green bgcolor. Accepted answers should be a lot easier to read now.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's still pretty faint for me, although that might just be my screen. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 30 '10 at 18:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .