I'm sorry, I didn't see this discussion as well as [the one before it](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8384/site-self-evaluation-what-is-it) until just today.

As others have mentioned, these evaluations were experimental on graduated sites. The philosophy behind them is potentially sound - just because a site leaves beta doesn't mean it's keeping up the standards and activity that makes for a successful site.

However, I have reviewed a bunch of the results and responses from this round of evaluations and in practice it turned out that graduated sites *are* doing as well as we would like them to and as I'm sure they would like to as well.

So **we have disabled this review queue on non-beta sites**. Thank you everyone who has participated in this round. You've helped us make and validate this decision. :)