Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with review
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 11619
For questions about the /review path where users can view and act on posts by other users that the system thinks may need attention.
15
votes
Accepted
Is the review tool *too* effective at helping us process items?
I approved some of them early on, but then I caught on that this is what the entire review queue was all about.
Two requests:
To new members: Don't do this! … To reputable members: Do check what the review is all about, please. Reject minor edits apparently done for the sole purpose of somebody wanting to earn an edit-related badge. …
- 138k
10
votes
STOP! Look and Listen.
I have seen one such test edit. It was so obvious to reject it. May be they can one day train their SW to send less and less obviously bad edits? May be the software can eventually do good edits? When …
- 138k