New answers tagged

2

Proposal: Remove euler-mascheroni-constant. It's a duplicate of eulers-constant


14

I have no strong feelings about whether there should be a separate tag about the number 'e'. (It was convenient way back when, when most of the questions tagged 'e' is about the function $e^x$.) I do think that the names can be confusing, whenever something has to do with Euler. Maybe, if we want to rename: For the number '$e$', name the tag 'eulers-...


-1

$\textbf{Proposal}:$ Create the tag Quotient-ring Searching for "Quotient ring" is:q returns 1010 results. There is also a tag quotient-group, so I thought that there may be one for rings too, given that is common to see a lot of questions about identifying quotient rings with some known ring, ideals, etc. The tag quotient-space seems too general. It ...


5

There is an obvious connection between $e$ and the exponential function $e^x$ (in the strict sense - could also be $a^x$). But the one is a number, important enough to deserve specific study, and the other a function. There must be a substantial corpus on both topics. I would vote for a tag "$e$", separate from "exponential-function", having the synonym "...


8

Proposal: Eliminate the tag transformation. The tag transformation is too broad—there are a large number of things in mathematics called "transformations" coming from diverse parts of mathematics, and tagging a question with this tag does nothing to refine or sort these different notions. I would like to see this tag dead and buried. I have spent ...


Top 50 recent answers are included