If not for ill-repute, I'd enjoy no reputation at all.
Enjoys programming in Prolog. Will solve math problems for food.
Rosser's trick: "For every proof of me, there is a shorter proof of my negation".
This is not the baggage check described by Article 4 of the Warsaw Convention.
Member for 9 years, 5 months
1,279 profile views
Last seen 5 hours ago
- Mathematics 31.7k 31.7k 99 gold badges5757 silver badges114114 bronze badges
- Stack Overflow 8.1k 8.1k 22 gold badges2929 silver badges5757 bronze badges
- Meta Stack Exchange 4.4k 4.4k 22 gold badges1414 silver badges1515 bronze badges
- Computational Science 3.1k 3.1k 11 gold badge1515 silver badges3535 bronze badges
- Coffee 989 989 77 silver badges1919 bronze badges
- View network profile →
Top network posts
- 377 Add an "I don't understand" option for review audits
- 193 The program can't start because libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll is missing
- 46 Can two topological spaces surject onto each other but not be homeomorphic?
- 36 What is the difference between == and = in Prolog?
- 30 How does a non-technical manager add value to team of self-motivated software developers?
- 26 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog
- 22 What are some theorems that currently only have computer-assisted proofs?
- View more network posts →