top 0.80% overall
If not for ill-repute, I'd enjoy no reputation at all.
Enjoys programming in Prolog. Will solve math problems for food.
Rosser's trick: "For every proof of me, there is a shorter proof of my negation".
This is not the baggage check described by Article 4 of the Warsaw Convention.
Member for 9 years, 8 months
1,314 profile views
Last seen 16 mins ago
- Mathematics 32k 32k 99 gold badges5858 silver badges114114 bronze badges
- Stack Overflow 8.2k 8.2k 22 gold badges2929 silver badges6060 bronze badges
- Meta Stack Exchange 4.5k 4.5k 22 gold badges1414 silver badges1515 bronze badges
- Computational Science 3.1k 3.1k 11 gold badge1515 silver badges3535 bronze badges
- Coffee 989 989 77 silver badges1919 bronze badges
- View network profile
Top network posts
- 384 Add an "I don't understand" option for review audits
- 196 The program can't start because libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll is missing
- 46 Can two topological spaces surject onto each other but not be homeomorphic?
- 38 What is the difference between == and = in Prolog?
- 30 How does a non-technical manager add value to team of self-motivated software developers?
- 26 org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog
- 22 What are some theorems that currently only have computer-assisted proofs?
- View more network posts →