Several decades ago, I did a degree in electronic engineering. This entailed learning how to use quite a lot of maths—but mostly not learning how to prove the maths. This is a shame because if I'd learnt properly, I'd probably have been more interested in the maths than in the engineering. (Before university, I enjoyed maths when it was a thing one did, and stopped enjoying it when it was a thing one remembered.)
I'm now trying to remedy this by examining every mathematical step or theorem that I have the last doubt about, and where possible, tracing it back to the most basic theorems, axioms and definitions I can.
I'm also trying, as far as possible, to translate mathematical concepts that I'm used to dealing with in symbols into non-technical, non-mathematical language, in order to get right to the core of each concept or underlying argument. So my answers on here are often efforts to explain ideas as clearly and simply as I can, with as little jargon as I can.
Non-mathematical interests include language, music, and psychology of learning—especially as it applies to adult self-education.
Northwest England, UK
Member for 6 months
96 profile views
Last seen Apr 5 at 22:59
Top network posts
- 71 What does the mysterious constant marked by C on a slide rule indicate?
- 10 How many parabolas can pass through two given points?
- 7 I have found a way of computing Euler's number. Is there any possible intuition of how that might be the case?
- 7 How to make a student not overlook easy mistakes such as the wrong sign
- 6 How to deal with a "protest" assignment?
- 5 Why does the circle naturally divide into $6$?
- 5 100kg of berries are 99% moisture, by weight. After two days, 98% moisture. What was their total weight after two days?
- View more network posts →