I just came across this suggested edit of the functional-analysis tag-wiki. Whether this edit actually fixes/improves the grammar or not is debatable (at least in my mind), and hence I chose to reject it. However, I was wondering what the community norm for these suggested edits is. We do not allow trivial edits of questions, and especially edits of questions that have been asked long before. This tag summary was created in 2011, and has since been unchanged. Do we allow trivial edits of tag summaries, if they offer just minor improvements? Or do we uphold the status quo?

Please let me know if my action was wrong, and I should act in a different way for tag edits.

I just came across this suggested edit of the functional-analysis tag-wiki. Whether this edit actually fixes/improves the grammar or not is debatable (at least in my mind), and hence I chose to reject it. However, I was wondering what the community norm for these suggested edits is. We do not allow trivial edits of questions, and especially edits of questions that have been asked long before. This tag summary was created in 2011, and has since been unchanged. Do we allow trivial edits of tag summaries, if they offer just minor improvements? Or do we uphold the status quo?

Please let me know if my action was wrong, and I should act in a different way for tag edits.

I just came across this edit of the functional analysis tag. Whether this edit actually fixes/improves the grammar or not is debatable (at least in my mind), and hence I chose to reject it. However, I was wondering- what's the community norm for these edits. We do not allow trivial edits of questions, and especially edits of questions that have been asked long before. This tag summary was created in 2011, and has since been unchanged. Do we allow trivial edits of tag summaries, if they offer just minor improvements? Or do we uphold the status-quo?

Please let me know if my action was wrong, and I should act in a different way for tag edits.

I just came across this suggested edit of the functional-analysis tag-wiki. Whether this edit actually fixes/improves the grammar or not is debatable (at least in my mind), and hence I chose to reject it. However, I was wondering what the community norm for these suggested edits is. We do not allow trivial edits of questions, and especially edits of questions that have been asked long before. This tag summary was created in 2011, and has since been unchanged. Do we allow trivial edits of tag summaries, if they offer just minor improvements? Or do we uphold the status quo?

Please let me know if my action was wrong, and I should act in a different way for tag edits.