Timeline for Why should we accept answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 1, 2012 at 7:11 | vote | accept | Martin Sleziak | ||
| Dec 28, 2011 at 3:35 | comment | added | Jonas Meyer | In addition to Zev's reason why it is usually not relevant, the bumping can also be a positive side effect of not accepting in cases where there is a good answer that went overlooked by voters. | |
| Dec 27, 2011 at 10:17 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles Mod | That's true, but it should be noted that that only comes into play if no answers have upvotes, which, while not necessarily an indication of poor quality (unfortunately), is not promising either. | |
| Dec 27, 2011 at 10:09 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Perhaps not that important as the three you mentioned, but accepting an answer also prevents the question from being bumped repeatedly: see here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/… | |
| Dec 27, 2011 at 10:05 | history | answered | Zev ChonolesMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |