Timeline for About posting identical answers to a question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2016 at 11:59 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 21:20 | vote | accept | Ron Gordon | ||
| Jan 14, 2013 at 21:11 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 46 | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 21:09 | answer | added | user53153 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 20:44 | comment | added | Ron Gordon | By the way, I'm not saying that one should stop writing when an answer appears. Just that, when there are already answers, that users read them to make sure that they are contributing new material. Also, it's not just about rep scores for the answer-ers, but clarity for the people who asked the question. | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 20:24 | comment | added | Ron Gordon | Here is one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/278747/…. You probably saw this and wondered what the problem was. The problem was in stating precisely the same insight I had, although I had answered > 10 minutes earlier. I suppose that this example makes me seem petty, but this is not the first time I have felt this way. Perhaps I should shrug and get a thicker skin. But have I raised a legitimate problem? Have any other members felt this way? | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 20:19 | comment | added | Thomas | I checked some of your recent answers, but I can't quite see what you are getting at. Could you give some examples? | |
| Jan 14, 2013 at 20:17 | history | edited | Ron Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 20:03 | history | edited | Ron Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 19:44 | history | asked | Ron Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |