Timeline for Possible Duplicate notice, sans closing, is not attributed nor in the Revisions list
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2013 at 4:11 | answer | added | user53153 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 17, 2013 at 16:40 | history | edited | Willie WongMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 17, 2013 at 2:19 | history | edited | zyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Feb 17, 2013 at 1:49 | history | edited | zyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 14:19 | history | edited | zyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 13:51 | comment | added | zyx | Looking there I see a debate and explanation of the new behavior, but not an explanation of why the user actions are hidden. If the design goal is to maintain the temporary shield around close voters, then the banner should not derive from a vote to close, but from a "send public warning of possible duplicate" option, with the latter equivalent to a visible edit. | |
| Feb 16, 2013 at 11:45 | answer | added | zyx | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 16, 2013 at 11:44 | history | edited | zyx |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 11:30 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/8414/… | |
| Feb 16, 2013 at 11:19 | history | asked | zyx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |