Timeline for Must still need some work for a question that is now closed.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 20, 2014 at 11:52 | answer | added | hardmath | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 20:44 | comment | added | Daniel Fischer | @eatscrayons Thumbs up for dealing with your difficulties regarding that question in a constructive way. That is awesome. I am a bit skeptical whether it is possible to to narrow it down enough that definite answers will be possible, but not so much that it becomes uninteresting. But I hope you will manage, good luck. | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 17:51 | comment | added | eatscrayons | @900 sit-ups a day I didn't think that would be acceptable so I am glad to see this is an option. All input would be appreciated when complete! | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 17:47 | comment | added | user147263 | You could start from scratch and post a new, carefully thought out question. | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 17:41 | comment | added | eatscrayons | @Gerry Myerson I went to do a hard re-edit on the question this morning but noticed it is now 'deleted'. Unfortunately this means it is not in a form 'good enough' to make a request for an un-delete as there is still confusion. The proverbial rock and hard place. Any advise from members as what to do next would be appreciated! | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 11:49 | comment | added | user147263 | @MartinSleziak That is true during the on-hold period; the referenced question is past that. | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 7:30 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @Gerry Myerson wrote: People have to know that the edits have been made. If I am not mistaken, after a question is edited, it goes into review queue, where users can vote whether the question should be reopened or not. (But using the linked thread can increase the chances, since more people will see the question.) | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 7:27 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 19, 2014 at 6:31 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Questions do not get reopened by themselves, even after good edits have been made. People have to know that the edits have been made. That can be done by what you've done here, posting a question to meta, but maybe better is posting an answer to the meta thread that has been set up for this kind of thing, meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/6424/… | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 1:13 | comment | added | eatscrayons | Okay, the wording is still bad then. I will do a re-edit and see if that clears things up (or better yet perhaps a complete re-wording is in order). I have been given some new information on other sites that may be helpful as well (similar cases of confusion). After complete, if you wouldn't mind, another look would be appreciated! | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 0:58 | comment | added | user147263 | The close reason is not "show more work". It is "unclear what you are asking". I re-read your post twice; still unclear. You say you want some formulas for $k^{1/2}$ in terms of $k$. As an example, you offer $5^{1/2}=2\phi-1$. ? | |
| Aug 18, 2014 at 23:57 | history | asked | eatscrayons | CC BY-SA 3.0 |