Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
May 21, 2015 at 13:11 comment added quid @TravisJ you are welcome. The chat is mainly there to signal posts that somebody thought should be (re)considered that already passed through the usual review. However some discussions happens there too and the regulars of the room are quite involved with voting so if you have some question related to this (like the one you asked here), you are likely to get some opinion there. However, if you are just somehow undecided about some specific post you are asked to review, a good thing to do can be to "skip."
May 21, 2015 at 1:05 comment added TravisJ That chat room looks really useful. I wasn't so worried that I failed my first audit. I was mostly just worried that I had fundamentally misunderstood what the correct procedure was/would be...
May 21, 2015 at 1:01 vote accept TravisJ
May 21, 2015 at 0:55 comment added TravisJ Thanks. That is the review in question... and I agree with your line of reasoning here. That is mostly how I felt (and why I voted the way I did). Thanks for the link to the dedicated chat. I was unaware that it existed (haven't actually used the chats here). Do people just discuss questionable close/reopen scenarios there? i.e. is it a good place if I have a question on a specific review to post a link?
May 20, 2015 at 23:57 comment added Surb "In general you should not vote to reopen a post that you think should eventually be closed only because you think the reason was wrong. " I fully agree. In an ideal world: one could leave a comment in the post to explain why this post should stay closed (so that OP could work on these other reasons too and edit his question in consequences).
May 20, 2015 at 21:51 history answered quid CC BY-SA 3.0