Timeline for Should I edit a hint to a complete answer; if, the author does not complain?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Sep 10, 2016 at 6:19 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Sep 10, 2016 at 1:42 | comment | added | hardmath | Anyone can propose edits to (almost) anything, but it is uncollegial and disruptive to make changes that affect the meaning/intent of the original author. If your feeling is that a full answer is more appropriate than a hint (this can depend on the Question, of course), you are certainly welcome to give a full answer on your own account. Short of that I'd put the option of leaving a Comment for the author of the original answer, suggesting a specific clarification. | |
Sep 10, 2016 at 1:39 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title; edited tags
|
Sep 10, 2016 at 0:30 | answer | added | user296602 | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 9, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | user296602 | That is still a radical change. Don't do it. | |
Sep 9, 2016 at 21:12 | comment | added | Did | @A---B Again: no. | |
Sep 9, 2016 at 21:07 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
Sep 9, 2016 at 21:02 | comment | added | user312097 |
@T.Bongers Oh, i did not think about that. Should i use >! to hide my answer. If the person wants to see the answer, he can hover over it.
|
|
Sep 9, 2016 at 20:47 | comment | added | quid | Just write your own answer, referencing the other if you want. | |
Sep 9, 2016 at 20:29 | comment | added | user296602 | No, you should not. The author wrote the post the way they did for a reason, and your edit radically changed the content. In this case, it is acceptable because the original poster accepted the edit, but usually it is bad practice. | |
Sep 9, 2016 at 20:21 | history | asked | user312097 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |