Timeline for Is it rude not to reply?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2017 at 17:03 | comment | added | tired | Straight to the point... | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:11 | comment | added | The Count | I crusade quite hard against egotism on this site, but I thought this answer was pretty spot-damn-on. | |
| Jan 17, 2017 at 23:11 | comment | added | Jonas Meyer | I agree with the answer to this question, the first and last sentences, "Nope. ... You are here for your enjoyment, not out of a debt to anyone." The middle part doesn't support that, but instead answers a question that wasn't asked, something like "Is it rude to expect all comments to be answered (thoroughly and promptly)"? Perhaps the questions aren't independent, but the middle part at least seems exaggerated as a counterpoint, because a response of "I will not elaborate further (optionally with a reason given)" given at your leisure doesn't require much. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 23:11 | comment | added | quid | Ironically, though not really, as the votes come in you seem to be Mr. Popularity with that attitude, which now maybe really ironically is in the end pretty close to that of those users that "harassed" you. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 20:34 | comment | added | quid | Well, you know, it could also be that when I do not have those problems so much it is that I approach the situation differently from the start. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 20:30 | comment | added | Ron Gordon | @quid: So you do. Not my place to be Mr. Popularity. When you have been harassed by a user who cannot do anything by his/herself with an endless series of questions, then you may end up realizing the same thing I did. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 20:28 | comment | added | quid | I find this answer pretty sad and egocentric. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 20:15 | history | answered | Ron Gordon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |