Timeline for How can we best judge who has the skills to be a moderator?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2012 at 13:48 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila Mod | @Carl: I agree with what you said. | |
| Dec 20, 2012 at 13:32 | comment | added | Carl Mummert | I don't think we should try to force most people to be active on meta. I look at meta from time to time and there is rarely anything for me to comment on. I could force myself to comment, but that seems like a waste of time when I could use my limited time on the site to answer questions. I do think that having a reasonable period of time (say 1 week) between nominations and voting would give the average user a reason to use meta during that time, and it would also give voters a written record they can look at before voting. | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 22:06 | comment | added | Mark Bennet | I think the "active on meta" idea could have some traction. An informed electorate is a prerequisite of true democracy. | |
| Dec 14, 2012 at 20:18 | history | answered | Asaf KaragilaMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |