Timeline for Single comment split into many comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
33 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 13, 2010 at 23:00 | history | locked | Jeff AtwoodMod | ||
| Nov 13, 2010 at 23:00 | history | rollback | Jeff AtwoodMod |
Rollback to Revision 8
|
|
| Nov 6, 2010 at 8:16 | history | rollback | kennytmMod |
Rollback to Revision 9
|
|
| Nov 6, 2010 at 7:59 | history | edited | Robin Chapman |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 6, 2010 at 7:58 | history | rollback | Robin Chapman |
Rollback to Revision 7
|
|
| Oct 28, 2010 at 6:24 | history | edited | Jeff AtwoodMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 21, 2010 at 20:42 | answer | added | Marc Gravell | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 18:10 | comment | added | T.. | @Jeff Atwood: the math.SE moderators are now wasting their time fixing this problem instance by instance, by manually splicing together comments that are disrupted by the new feature. If it looks like a bug, and walks like a bug... [and by the way, thanks for the upgrade to the @comment feature allowing this message to be sent to your inbox.] | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 18:01 | history | rollback | T.. |
Rollback to Revision 5
|
|
| Oct 21, 2010 at 17:23 | comment | added | kennytm Mod | @T..: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36052/… | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 17:22 | comment | added | T.. | @KennyTM: how would Jeff receive it if he did not post an answer or comment in the thread? This is why I wrote it as above: he seems to read discussions tagged [bug]. | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 15:56 | comment | added | kennytm Mod | @T..: If you want to write to Jeff, add a comment with "@Jeff". Revisions to the post won't be shown in a user's inbox. | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 22:29 | comment | added | Rasmus | Thank you, ShreevatsaR. Apparently, I was too hasty. For what it's worth, I like the new feature -- but could cope as well without it. =) | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 20:42 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | @Rasmus: No it doesn't. For instance, my comments may appear fine, but I have to often struggle quite a bit with editing comments (sometimes have to type them in another editor and paste them here, out of fear of posting accidentally). So I'm most certainly not included among users who "cope with it quite well", but you couldn't tell from reading comment threads. More importantly, why should anyone have to cope with something like this? The benefits are minuscule compared to the hardships. | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 18:02 | comment | added | Rasmus | @Robin: Does reading a certain amount of comment threads qualify as survey? | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 12:13 | comment | added | Robin Chapman | Rasmus, have you done a survey to justify your figure of 99% "coping with it quite well"? | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 11:02 | comment | added | Rasmus | Shouldn't this dissatisfaction be expressed on meta.stackexchange? And is it really such a huge problem? I mean, 99% of the users or more cope with it quite well. | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 5:25 | history | edited | T.. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 281 characters in body; edited body; added 3 characters in body; added 7 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2010 at 4:53 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Rasmus: I think to make the point that we think it is a bug, or at least, a surprising and undesirable change. As I see it, we have basically no agency in getting the SE people to roll back this undesirable change to our site. In turn, it seems fair for them not to stop us from expressing our dissatisfaction with it. | |
| Oct 16, 2010 at 21:58 | comment | added | Rasmus | Why do you keep retagging it as "bug" if it's apparently not a bug? | |
| Oct 16, 2010 at 20:23 | history | rollback | Robin Chapman |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Oct 16, 2010 at 20:15 | answer | added | ShreevatsaR | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 16, 2010 at 19:27 | answer | added | T.. | timeline score: 11 | |
| Oct 16, 2010 at 18:53 | history | edited | Jeff AtwoodMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 16, 2010 at 15:13 | history | edited | ShreevatsaR |
it is a bug!
|
|
| Oct 16, 2010 at 7:51 | history | edited | Jeff AtwoodMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 12, 2010 at 18:21 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Wow. This is the most annoying 'feaure' so far... | |
| Sep 11, 2010 at 13:11 | answer | added | kennytmMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 11, 2010 at 12:47 | comment | added | user856 | Robin Chapman explains here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/779/… | |
| Sep 11, 2010 at 12:45 | comment | added | Pierre-Yves Gaillard | @Day Late Don : Thanks for your answer! | |
| Sep 11, 2010 at 12:39 | comment | added | Blue | I see the same thing. | |
| Sep 11, 2010 at 12:11 | history | asked | Pierre-Yves Gaillard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |