Timeline for Can users post proofs here they think are valid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2022 at 6:58 | comment | added | Calvin Khor | For posterity, here is a screenshot of the question in its current state for you: i.sstatic.net/AVdWg.png | |
| Jan 11, 2022 at 6:08 | answer | added | Martin Sleziak | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 23:04 | comment | added | user1012858 | @MartinSleziak The link does not work for me. But yes that was the proof. The error is P1 should be N1 and P2 should be N2 where N1 and N2 are in the range 1 to (P-1). That's the fix. If the good people here at MSE would let me access my own post that would be nice... as I have an update. Thanks. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 23:00 | comment | added | user1012858 | @BillDubuque YES! I have a proof that is not long which I posted a few days a go and I realize an error in the proof which I'll fix. But I went further in the proof recently and have a question about a specific step. Thanks | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 21:42 | comment | added | amWhy | Thanks, @MartinS for the link. Please, everyone who can, please read the appropriate comments given below that question. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 18:37 | comment | added | amWhy | But even solution-verification, requires your work. We are not here to evaluate a post "I found this proof somewhere, or I found this proof on this website; can you tell me if it is correct?" And if your own proof attempt has already been used to answer the question you are proving, then it can rightfully be closed as a duplicate. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 18:36 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Was the question about sums of two primes? | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 18:33 | comment | added | rschwieb | Here is the most recent iteration of community discussion on use of solution-verification, which has some advice on how to try to fit such things to the site. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 17:27 | comment | added | Bill Dubuque | To be on-topic, a solution verification question should not be a broad question such as "is there any error in my (long) proof". Rather it should pose a question about a specific step in the proof, and should include remarks about why you have doubts about such. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 15:32 | comment | added | Sarvesh Ravichandran Iyer | If someone finds that post, we can see what it contains and find how it can be refined , perhaps, to fit the site better. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 15:31 | comment | added | Sarvesh Ravichandran Iyer | This really depends on what you're trying to prove. The usual issues with questions seeking validation of proofs are (1) That the proof is of a "famous open" conjecture (and not a part of it : likely a part of it should anyway be acceptable) (2) The proof should not be too lengthy to be classified as broad. Usually something spanning a page (in PC mode) should be alright, while I can't say anything about something longer than that. These will likely be closed as "off-topic" and "broad" respectively. If your question has no issues, you can go ahead with the solution-verification tag. | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 14:05 | history | migrated | from math.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 10, 2022 at 0:09 | comment | added | user1012858 | @dxiv Yes... and that answers that! | |
| Jan 10, 2022 at 0:07 | comment | added | dxiv |
Did you delete and recreate the pEYEp account by any chance? If so, MSE counts it as a different user.
|
|
| Jan 10, 2022 at 0:00 | comment | added | Arctic Char | If I understand correctly, a post or an answer on MSE cannot be moved to chat. For deleted question/answer, if it is deleted recently you can find it into your profile. | |
| Jan 9, 2022 at 23:45 | history | asked | user1012858 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
