Timeline for Are my serial downvotes inappropriate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
35 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 at 5:55 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | Maybe a recent discussion on meta might be of interest to you in relation to this: Someone is doing “targeted serial downvoting” against me? (Just a guess, but I thought it might be useful to let you know about that discussion.) | |
| Sep 7, 2017 at 11:55 | answer | added | goblin GONE | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 30, 2017 at 0:21 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @AlexM This time I took some screenshots - see here and here. As you can see, reputation reversal was shown there one day and was no longer displayed a day later. The most likely explanation is that reputation changes related to deleted votes are not shown to other users. (So they wer no longer shown after the deletion.) Still the user in question should see them if they chose "show removed post" option. | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 18:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMath/status/902242258929385472 | ||
| Aug 28, 2017 at 12:50 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | @Shalop I believe it comes at 10,000 rep: math.stackexchange.com/help/privileges | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 12:01 | comment | added | shalin | @SimplyBeautifulArt How does one go about seeing deleted answers? Is that some kind of privelege for having a billion rep or something, or am I just not looking closely enough? | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 0:32 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 27, 2017 at 23:17 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | @rocksNwaves ?? | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 21:49 | comment | added | rocksNwaves | I serially upvote downvoted questions. | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 0:44 | answer | added | quid | timeline score: 21 | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 0:40 | comment | added | user9464 | @amWhy: Thanks for the comment. This question was asked two days ago and I can only see comments so far. I am wondering if I should inform the moderators about this particular case. The only concern for me is that if I'm voting to delete correct answers. I found after I posted this question that the ridiculous exponential nonsense was also from this same user. Considering also Alex's comment, I seriously doubt whether this user has the real correct knowledge on nonstandard analysis. | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 16:00 | history | edited | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Aug 26, 2017 at 15:55 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @AlexM. I no longer see it there. I'm pretty sure I saw it when I posted my comment - maybe I should have made a screenshot. (Maybe all the post related to those reputation changes were deleted and that's why we no longer see the reputation changes.) But I guess it is not very difficult to find some other user profiles with voting reversals. Since this seems only tangential to the issue at hand, we can continue this discussion in chat, if needed. | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 15:49 | comment | added | Alex M. | @MartinSleziak: Do you have any special MSE privileges that allow you to view things that I cannot see? I'm looking at this user's reputation and I see no voting correction. | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 15:45 | comment | added | Alex M. | Let me add something to the discussion: I had a brief virtual encounter with that user last year, when I detected him using 3 separate accounts; of them, one was for posting, and another one for upvoting his own posts. When confonted with this fact, he quickly deleted 2 out of those 3 accounts. Regarding his posts - some of them are ok, but there is a lot of non-standard analysis in answers to simple high-school questions where the OP is obviously looking for "standard" analysis. I myself have downvoted and voted to delete many of this user's posts. | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 15:17 | comment | added | Franklin Pezzuti Dyer | Is it not ironic that the mentioned user's username is "selfawareuser"? | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 8:51 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @Jack The second answer from the second list has no downvotes at the moment. Perhaps you can check the other answers, but I guess that your votes have been reversed by the automated script which removes serial votes. (Also on the user's profile I see today +8 reversal - Voting corrected. Of course, I cannot see whether the reversed votes were yours - voting is anonymous.) | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 8:45 | history | edited | Viktor Vaughn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
| Aug 25, 2017 at 6:53 | comment | added | user21820 | @achillehui: That's okay. I'm just stating it in case people get the wrong impression. I look sufficiently at every single answer that I delete. =) | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 6:46 | comment | added | achille hui | @user21820 I didn't bother to look at all the answers. | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 6:44 | comment | added | user21820 | @achillehui: No they do not. In a lot of those cases the user claims that L'Hopital's rule is false, just because his weird manipulations arrive at a contradiction. Also, he is willy-nilly using the idea of nilsquare elements all over. | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 3:38 | comment | added | achille hui | From the viewpoint of non-standard analysis, some of the added answers (the one you just added) do make sense. It is a little bit handwaving but the spirit is mostly correct. | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 0:33 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 22:10 | comment | added | amWhy | It depends on how one defines "targeting" a user. Focusing in on one user to the exclusion of other moderating actions, may not fare well upon the crunching of numbers, by the daily scripts detecting "serial voting". I am not suggesting you were serially downvoting or deleting for any reason other than enhancement of site quality. You made a lot of good calls; but maybe review such a user's posts less rapidly; as is, many of the posts in question are from a year ago. Bottom line: Your honesty here is applaud-able. And it's a good question, in general!! | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:52 | history | edited | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:45 | history | edited | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:42 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | Yeah, this user is definitely misinterpreting Taylor's theorem. I don't believe the deletion was bad, despite them all coming from the same user. | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | user9464 | @SimplyBeautifulArt: Fixed now. Thanks. | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | The second deleted answer is outright nonsense, in general, there should be another correction term. | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:39 | history | edited | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:38 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | Series are related, but I think you meant "serial", as in many votes to one user. | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:33 | history | edited | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 60 characters in body
|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:33 | history | undeleted | user9464 | ||
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:25 | history | deleted | user9464 | via Vote | |
| Aug 24, 2017 at 21:19 | history | asked | user9464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |